Frequently Asked Questions: Grazing

The following FAQs focus on SNAPGraze and grazing practice changes viable for ESMC’s Grazing program.

Who We Are

Trees will need to be removed out of the paddocks when boundaries are included, but they will not be part of the system being modeled.

It will be useful to have this recorded to understand the relationship with biomass production.

It is total size of grazable acres. Producers cannot include a pond, or rocks, or trees. Those will need to be removed from the field boundaries when inputting them into the MMRV.

If this is short term, it can be ignored in the modeling framework.
If this is long term, this would be difficult to model. ESMC may require new shapefiles to properly run the model on partial areas. ESMC would like to capture the average management practices during a year by area of interest.

No, they cannot enroll without an exact date. That is a requirement.

Producers should enter bale size by weight.

Producers should input when they make a paddock movement so if there was not enough grass in the paddock, then when they had to add a bale.

This is needed so ESMC knows that producers are not grazing what is on the field.

ESMC will have a common option list, and producers will have the option for “other” if those options are not included.

This is not required by SnapGraze. *Note: Sedley is discussing with the ESMC team whether we need it for any reason.

If we need it, the following work:

  • lbs/acres if solid
  • gallons/acres if liquid

This is not a practice change that captures grazing management. The practice change of cropland grazing is associated with a commodity crop, not the animal that is grazing.

Ecosystem Services Market Consortium © 2026 | Privacy Policy

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?